Mmcp.market

Is Veto safe?

Probably. Read the findings first.

C63/100grade C

Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.

What to know before installing
  • highShell command built from a string (injection risk)

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.3 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 high1 medium
  • Code scan318 source files scanned8/25
  • Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 4 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10

Findings (2)

  • mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval
    dist/agents/security/penetration.js: …turn no data or 400, not 500', 'eval() and shell execution with user input ar…
  • highShell command built from a string (injection risk)exec.shell-concat
    dist/memory/local.js: …n`. See VETO_DB_SCHEMA_VERSION. _db.exec(`PRAGMA user_version = ${VETO_DB_SCHEMA_VERSION}`); return _d…
Overall 63/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Full listing, tools and install

Is Veto MCP server safe? Grade C · mcp.market