Is Codeseeker MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
How Codeseeker compares
Against every graded Web search MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 69/100
- higher than 35% of 3,470 Web search servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 1 read
Release history: 3 versions in the registry since 2026-09-09, latest 2026-09-22, typically one every 8 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
3 medium
- Code scan703 source files scanned10/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 10 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (3)
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.script - mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/cli/quality/services/compilation-service.js: …parse with Node new Function(content); } …
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.scriptpackage.json: …deseeker.js" }, "scripts": { "postinstall": "node scripts/postinstall.js", "bu…
Overall 69/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Codeseeker does
- not reviewedEstablishedA
- CrgToken-efficient code review knowledge graph: semantic search and call-graph resolution.not reviewedEstablishedB
Shodh MemoryCognitive memory for AI agents — semantic search, Hebbian learning, knowledge graphs.not reviewedEstablishedC