Is Codex4ever MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Codex4ever compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 85/100
- higher than 73% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 5 read · 1 create
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan7 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalserver/codex4ever.mjs: …Code, sch); const validate2 = new Function(`${names_1.default.self}`, `${names_1.de…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Codex4ever does
- three.ws BillingAn agent's account economics — plan quotas, metered usage, invoices, receipts, and earnings.not reviewedEstablishedB
- Agent-Native PlanStructured visual plans and PR recaps with diagrams, prototypes, annotations, and sharingnot reviewedEstablishedA
- SuperCompressCompress coding-agent context ~64%. Hosted Neural Keep MCP for Cursor/Claude/Codex.not reviewedEstablishedB