Is MemoryGuard MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B74/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.8 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan215 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 7 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

agent_memguard-0.7.12/src/memoryguard/desktop_executor.py: …_force() try: root.eval("tk::PlaceWindow . center") exce…

mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true

agent_memguard-0.7.12/src/memoryguard/rules/skill_rules.py: …"脚本含 rm -rf / curl | sh subprocess.call(shell=True)" negative_example = "脚本只做只读分析，无写操作…

Overall 74/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Prism Coder
Session memory for coding agents: local-first recall, drift detection, on-device inference.
not reviewed
Established
C
Memorix
Local-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.
not reviewed
Established
B
Deja Vu
deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of thirty-three coding agents.
not reviewed
Established
A