Is MemoryGuard MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B74/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How MemoryGuard compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan215 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 15 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

agent_memguard-0.7.12/src/memoryguard/desktop_executor.py: …_force() try: root.eval("tk::PlaceWindow . center") exce…

mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true

agent_memguard-0.7.12/src/memoryguard/rules/skill_rules.py: …"脚本含 rm -rf / curl | sh subprocess.call(shell=True)" negative_example = "脚本只做只读分析，无写操作…

Overall 74/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Deja Vu
deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of forty-three coding agents.
not reviewed
Established
A
Memorix
Local-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.
not reviewed
Established
B
Nautilus Compass Memory
Local-first long-term memory for AI agents, with byte-recomputable signed verification receipts.
not reviewed
Established
B