Is UISandbox MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How UISandbox compares
Against every graded Scraping and browsing MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 83/100
- higher than 60% of 867 Scraping and browsing servers
- Tools that change things
- 22%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 5 read · 1 create · 3 change
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-08-30, latest 2026-10-21, typically one every 52 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-29 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan14 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 7 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/server.mjs: …e__error")) throw new Error(await page.$eval(".intake__error", (e) => e.textContent |…
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what UISandbox does
- GrowBlocks Dev KitBuild, play-test with screenshots, and ship three.js browser games on GrowBlocks.5.0(1)NewA
- FableCutZero-dependency browser video editor AI agents drive via a JSON timeline over MCP; ffmpeg export.not reviewedEstablishedA
- SeleniumBase MCPStealthy browser automation, testing, and web-scraping via CDP Mode.not reviewedWidely usedA