MCP.Market

Is ShortSmash MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B74/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How ShortSmash compares

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
74/100
higher than 43% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Tools that change things
25%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 3 read · 1 create

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium
  • Code scan42 source files scanned15/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10

Findings (2)

  • mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval
    shortsmash-0.3.0/shortsmash/vision_local.py: …rocessor.from_pretrained(src) model.eval() return model, processor def scor…
  • mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true
    shortsmash-0.3.0/shortsmash/visual.py: …ation=duration) subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True, check=True, timeout=600) if not ou…
Overall 74/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what ShortSmash does

ShortSmash reviews, tools and install