Mmcp.market

Is Fidelis Memory MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B83/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.8 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium
  • Code scan53 source files scanned20/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10

Findings (1)

  • mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval
    fidelis_memory-0.1.0/experiments/zeroLLM-FLAGSHIP-evidence/SUMMARY.json: …tified (10/qtype). F2-FULL = full 470-Q eval (434 graded; remaining 36 from KU/TR part…
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Fidelis Memory does

  • Total Agent Memory
    Persistent local memory for coding agents: temporal knowledge graph, procedural and episodic recall
    A
  • Hicortex — AI Fleet Memory
    Shared fleet memory for AI agents: nightly self-correction, recall every prompt (supported agents).
    C
  • Agent Memory Os
    Local-first memory engine for AI-agent teams: team/project ACL, recall, and federated sync.
    A

Fidelis Memory reviews, tools and install