Is Fidelis Memory MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B83/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Fidelis Memory compares

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 83/100; higher than 68% of 4,460 AI and agents servers

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-09-13, latest 2026-09-20, typically one every 7 days.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan56 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 13 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10

Findings (1)

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

fidelis_memory-0.2.0/experiments/zeroLLM-FLAGSHIP-evidence/SUMMARY.json: …tified (10/qtype). F2-FULL = full 470-Q eval (434 graded; remaining 36 from KU/TR part…

Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Other servers that do what Fidelis Memory does

Memanto
MCP server for Memanto - persistent semantic memory for any MCP-compatible agent
not reviewed
Established
A
Agent Recall
Correction-first agent memory. Precision KPI tracks if agents heed warnings. 5 layers, local-only.
not reviewed
Established
A
Total Agent Memory
Persistent local memory for coding agents: temporal knowledge graph, procedural and episodic recall
not reviewed
Established
A

Fidelis Memory reviews, tools and install