Is Guaardvark MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Guaardvark compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 82/100
- higher than 65% of 4,464 AI and agents servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan70 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 2 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-trueguaardvark-3.3.0/llx/local_tools.py: …Captures output (truncated). Never uses shell=True for safety.""" base = cwd or Path.c…
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Guaardvark does
- Runapi130+ AI models for image, video, music, and audio — 18 model families, one RunAPI account.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Agent-Native AssetsDigital asset manager - upload, organize, search, and generate on-brand images and videosnot reviewedEstablishedA
WaveSpeedRun any model on the live WaveSpeed catalog: image, video, audio, 3D.not reviewedEstablishedA
