Is Analook — Competitor Intelligence MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How Analook — Competitor Intelligence compares
Against every graded E-commerce MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 79/100
- higher than 68% of 2,172 E-commerce servers
- Tools that change things
- 25%
- typical: 3%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote E-commerce server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 6 read · 1 change · 1 run or deploy
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-10 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1093ms20/20
- Tool poisoning8 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 2 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 79/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Analook — Competitor Intelligence does
- Idea RealityPre-build reality check. Scans GitHub, HN, npm, PyPI, Product Hunt — returns 0-100 signal.not reviewedEstablishedB
- PostHog MCP ServerOfficial PostHog MCP Server for product analytics, feature flags, experiments, and more.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Loki ModeAutonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI with an MCP server exposing 39 tools over stdio.not reviewedEstablishedB
Analook — Competitor Intelligence reviews, tools and install