Is Ghostchars MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Ghostchars compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 83/100
- higher than 65% of 48,255 servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-01 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan14 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/mcp.js: …ode, sch); const makeValidate = new Function(`${names_1.default.self}`, `${names_1.de…
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON