
Is Cloudeval AI MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Cloudeval AI compares
Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 77/100
- higher than 45% of 1,119 Developer tools servers
- Tools that change things
- 10%
- typical: 5%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 60 read · 1 create · 7 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan17 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 21 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/chunk-5AJUVXAA.js: …s.bun === "string"; var dynamicImport = new Function("specifier", "return import(specifier)")…
Overall 77/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Cloudeval AI does
- TerraVisionDraw cloud architecture diagrams with official AWS, Azure and GCP icons from a prompt or Terraform.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Cloud FinOps Skill & MCPCloud cost + FinOps knowledge for AI agents: AWS/Azure/GCP optimisation, AI spend, waste playbooks.not reviewedEstablishedA
- ShipStaticDeploy static websites, landing pages, and prototypes instantly. Free, no account needed.not reviewedEstablishedA