MCP.Market

Is FreeTTS MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A88/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How FreeTTS compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
88/100
higher than 75% of 48,255 servers
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%

What its tools let an agent do: 7 read

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-01 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium
  • Code scan15 source files scanned20/25
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1980ms20/20
  • Tool poisoning7 tool descriptions checked15/15
  • Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
  • Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; website matches verified namespace8/10

Findings (1)

  • mediumPath built from user input without normalizationfs.traversal
    dist/index.js: …Control", "public, max-age=86400"); res.sendFile(`icon-${req.params.size}.png`, { root: ASSETS }, (err) => …
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

FreeTTS reviews, tools and install