Is Foura MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How Foura compares
Against every graded Scraping and browsing MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 86/100
- higher than 67% of 866 Scraping and browsing servers
- Tools that change things
- 25%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote Scraping and browsing server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 3 read · 1 change
Release history: 5 versions in the registry since 2026-09-17, latest 2026-10-28, typically one every 15 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan28 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1971ms20/20
- Tool poisoning4 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 1 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityendpoint served from the registry-verified namespace domain8/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 86/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Foura does
- SeleniumBase MCPStealthy browser automation, testing, and web-scraping via CDP Mode.not reviewedWidely usedA
- AIHawkAI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.not reviewedWidely usedA
- Browser UseBrowser agents and stealth cloud browsers for AI: run web tasks, fill forms, extract data.not reviewedEstablishedA