Is Flowzap MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A86/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

What to know before installing

How Flowzap compares

Against every graded Maps and travel MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 86/100; higher than 79% of 679 Maps and travel servers
Tools that change things: 23%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Uptime: 100%; of our recent checks; the typical remote Maps and travel server answers 100%

What its tools let an agent do: 10 read · 3 change

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-08-11, latest 2026-09-20, typically one every 40 days.

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-16 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 high

Code scan21 source files scanned25/25
Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1207ms20/20
Tool poisoning13 tool descriptions checked15/15
Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 3 write-action tools with no auth3/15
Maintenancelast push 26 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Overall 86/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Repo Graph
Structural graph map of any codebase so LLMs navigate by structure, not guesswork.
not reviewed
Growing
A
Agentmap
The TS/JS-accurate repo map for coding agents: ts-morph import/symbol/call graph + MCP query tools
not reviewed
Growing
C
Infranodus Infranodus
Map text into knowledge graphs to create a structured representation of conceptual relations and t…
not reviewed
Growing
A