Is Abe MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Abe compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 72/100
- higher than 40% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 3 read
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-13 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan24 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalabe_ai-0.2.3/abe/evaluator.py: …"Deterministic condition evaluation. No eval(), no executable policy code. A conditi…
Overall 72/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Abe does
- DecionisAuthorize consequential AI agent actions before executionnot reviewedEstablishedA
- Roast My Design SystemAudit your Design System and serve your Agent the rules that keep AI-written UI on-system.not reviewedEstablishedA
KilnSpawn an object into existence: describe it, and your agent designs it, checks it, and 3D prints it.not reviewedEstablishedB
