Is Spawner MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Spawner compares
Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 40% of 1,119 Developer tools servers
- Tools that change things
- 22%
- typical: 5%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 7 read · 2 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-13 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan2 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 2 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalspawner.cjs: …&&(l=this.opts.code.process(l,e));let p=new Function(`${du.default.self}`,`${du.default.scope…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Spawner does
- FolioSelf-hosted Git-backed team wiki: search, read and edit pages, data tables and whiteboards.not reviewedGrowingA
ContentrainGit content governance, 23 deterministic MCP tools. Hosted: docs.contentrain.io/developer/mcp-cloudnot reviewedEstablishedC- NoraOperate self-hosted OpenClaw and Hermes agent fleets on Docker or Kubernetes from MCP clients.not reviewedGrowingB