Is webfetch MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
How webfetch compares
Against every graded SEO MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 65/100
- higher than 20% of 769 SEO servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 4 read · 1 create
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-07 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan59 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 107 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalwebfetch_llm-0.1.3/evals/run_matcher_eval.py: …""" Layer 1: offline semantic-matcher eval (no network beyond model downloads). Ans…
Overall 65/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what webfetch does
- SEO Tools: A-Parser bridgeBridge to a self-hosted A-Parser: SERP, suggests and 150+ parsers via its API (read-only).not reviewedGrowingB
Open SEO CrawlerSelf-hosted SEO crawler: run site audits and AI crawler checks, then read the issues and pages.not reviewedGrowingA- Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP ServerSelf-hosted technical SEO audit MCP. 50+ checks, WAF detection, ephemeral. Built on LibreCrawl.not reviewedGrowingB