Is Grok FAF MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B75/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Grok FAF compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 75/100; higher than 45% of 48,255 servers
Tools that change things: 6%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 63 read · 4 change

Release history: 6 versions in the registry since 2026-08-20, latest 2026-10-29, typically one every 8 days.

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan171 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; GitHub account older than a year; website matches verified namespace7/10

mediumnpm install lifecycle script presentinstall.script

package.json: … "prepublishOnly": "npm run build", "postinstall": "node scripts/postinstall.js", "deb…

Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON