Is Nuzo Memory MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
What to know before installing
- highRepository is archived
How Nuzo Memory compares
Against every graded Databases MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 69/100
- higher than 26% of 802 Databases servers
- Tools that change things
- 16%
- typical: 10%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 15 read · 1 create · 3 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan15 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancerepository archived0/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- highRepository is archived
maint.archived
Overall 69/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Nuzo Memory does
- RememLocal-first automatic memory for Claude Code and Codex: capture, distill, recall from SQLite.not reviewedEstablishedB
- open-memexLocal-first memory for AI coding agents — Markdown + SQLite FTS5, shared across editors via MCP.not reviewedGrowingB
SAME - Stateless Agent Memory EnginePersistent memory for AI coding agents. Local-first SQLite + vector search. 17 MCP tools.not reviewedGrowingB
