Is MNE-MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How MNE-MCP compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 85/100
- higher than 73% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 3%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 37 read · 1 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan14 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalmne_mcp-0.2.2/src/mne_mcp/kernel.py: …one: result_value = eval( compile(ast.Exp…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what MNE-MCP does
- MCP Server for WinDbg Crash AnalysisA Model Context Protocol server for Windows crash dump analysis using WinDbg/CDBnot reviewedEstablishedA
- StataLet LLM help you achieve your regression analysis with Statanot reviewedEstablishedC
- DepwireDependency graph + 24 MCP tools. Impact analysis, simulation, security, agent coordinationnot reviewedEstablishedB
