MCP.Market

Is ontomics MCP server safe?

Probably. Read the findings first.

C66/100grade C

Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.

How ontomics compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
66/100
higher than 23% of 48,255 servers

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium
  • Code scan7 source files scanned15/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 164 days ago8/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Findings (2)

  • mediumnpm install lifecycle script presentinstall.script
  • mediumnpm install lifecycle script presentinstall.script
    package.json: …check": "prettier --check **/*.js", "postinstall": "node ./install.js" }, "supportedPl…
Overall 66/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what ontomics does

  • Codebase Memory
    Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
    C
  • Trace
    Code graph MCP: 81 languages, 91 frameworks, 72.7% fewer PR-review tokens, comprehension at parity
    A
  • Honcho
    Memory that reasons: continual learning for stateful agents. Better context, fewer tokens.
    A

ontomics reviews, tools and install