Is ontomics MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
How ontomics compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 66/100
- higher than 23% of 48,255 servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan7 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 164 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (2)
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.script - mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.scriptpackage.json: …check": "prettier --check **/*.js", "postinstall": "node ./install.js" }, "supportedPl…
Overall 66/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what ontomics does
- Codebase MemoryCodebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.not reviewedWidely usedC
TraceCode graph MCP: 81 languages, 91 frameworks, 72.7% fewer PR-review tokens, comprehension at paritynot reviewedEstablishedA- HonchoMemory that reasons: continual learning for stateful agents. Better context, fewer tokens.not reviewedEstablishedA