Is Parallel Browser MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B75/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Parallel Browser MCP compares

Against every graded Scraping and browsing MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 75/100; higher than 45% of 866 Scraping and browsing servers
Tools that change things: 8%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 21 read · 4 change · 1 run or deploy

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan41 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
Maintenancelast push 17 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

dist/tools/browser/registerBrowserTools.js: …) => { const callback = new Function(expression); return call…

Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Browser Gateway
AI browser tools with Chrome CDP. Navigate, screenshot, interact. Multi-provider failover.
not reviewed
Growing
B
One Search
Web search, URL discovery, scraping & extraction with agent-browser and search providers
not reviewed
Growing
B
vibatchium
Stealth browser automation for AI agents — real Chrome, N parallel persistent logged-in sessions.
not reviewed
Growing
A