Is PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
How PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) compares
Against every graded Databases MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 68/100
- higher than 25% of 802 Databases servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-16 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan4 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (2)
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.script - mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.scriptpackage.json: … "README.md" ], "scripts": { "postinstall": "node scripts/postinstall.js", "tes…
Overall 68/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) does
- DBHubToken-efficient database MCP server for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLitenot reviewedWidely usedA
FaucetSQL database to MCP tools and REST API: PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLite, Snowflake.not reviewedEstablishedA- BackenlyPostgres backend your coding agent builds over MCP; destructive actions wait for a person.not reviewedEstablishedA
