MCP.Market

Is Confdiff MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B82/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Confdiff compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
82/100
higher than 63% of 48,243 servers
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 2 read

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-09-05, latest 2026-09-20, typically one every 15 days.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium
  • Code scan2 source files scanned20/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 24 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10

Findings (1)

  • mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval
    bin/confdiff-mcp.cjs: …&&(u=this.opts.code.process(u,t));let p=new Function(`${un.default.self}`,`${un.default.scope…
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Confdiff does

  • Sem
    Entity-level code intelligence: semantic diff, impact analysis, blame, and context for AI agents
    B

Confdiff reviews, tools and install