Is Sanction MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Sanction compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 81/100
- higher than 63% of 4,461 AI and agents servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote AI and agents server answers 100%
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-08-28, latest 2026-10-03, typically one every 35 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-30 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan3 source files scanned20/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 2177ms (auth required)17/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityauth enforced (unknown)9/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalmcp-server.js: …ode, sch); const makeValidate = new Function(`${names_1.default.self}`, `${names_1.de…
Overall 81/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Sanction does
- Doc BridgeResolve documentation ownership, edit roots, checks, and human handoffs before an agent edits code.not reviewedEstablishedA
- HOL GuardLocal-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.not reviewedEstablishedA
- DecionisAuthorize consequential AI agent actions before executionnot reviewedEstablishedA
