Is Docfork MCP server safe?
Not recommended.
Hidden from default browsing. Significant findings or unreachable.
What to know before installing
- highRemote endpoint did not respond — TypeError: fetch failed
- highRepository is archived
How Docfork compares
Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 54/100
- higher than 10% of 1,113 Developer tools servers
- Uptime
- 0%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote Developer tools server answers 100%
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-31 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 high
- Code scan10 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote unreachable: TypeError: fetch failed0/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancerepository archived0/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10
Findings (2)
- highRemote endpoint did not respond
reliability.unreachableTypeError: fetch failed
- highRepository is archived
maint.archived
Overall 54/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Safer options for the same job
RepowiseCodebase intelligence for AI coding agents: graph, git history, docs, decisions, code health.not reviewedWidely usedB
Gk CLIThe GitKraken MCP Server for managing repos, PRs, issues across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and more.not reviewedEstablishedB- GitDiagramArchitecture diagrams, explanations and Mermaid source for public GitHub repositories.not reviewedEstablishedB