Is Envault MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
How Envault compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 68/100
- higher than 33% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 39%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 14 read · 9 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan3 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 26 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (2)
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.script - mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.scriptpackage.json: … "prepublishOnly": "npm run check", "postinstall": "node postinstall.mjs" }, "publishC…
Overall 68/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Envault does
- Agent-Native ChatMinimal chat-first app with durable threads, actions, and the app-agent loopnot reviewedEstablishedA
- CHAP CoordinatorAuditable records of human decisions over AI agent work. Approvals, edits, overrides, escalations.not reviewedEstablishedA