Is Agentic Browser MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Agentic Browser compares
Against every graded Scraping and browsing MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 45% of 807 Scraping and browsing servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-24 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan15 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (2)
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.script - mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.scriptpackage.json: … test/watcher.claude-code.test.js", "postinstall": "node scripts/postinstall.js" }, "k…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Agentic Browser does
Public BrowserChrome over CDP for AI agents. Blind benchmark vs agent-browser: -33% tokens, -33% cost, -32% timenot reviewedGrowingA
TapBrowser MCP for logged-in tasks. Uses your Chrome — credentials stay local. Zero-token replay.not reviewedGrowingB
TabRunnerGive browser tasks to TabRunner, an agent in your own Chrome that uses your logins.not reviewedGrowingA