Is COTAL actions (cotal.ai) MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How COTAL actions (cotal.ai) compares
Against every graded E-commerce MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 81/100
- higher than 73% of 2,174 E-commerce servers
- Tools that change things
- 50%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote E-commerce server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 6 read · 6 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 97ms20/20
- Tool poisoning12 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 6 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityendpoint served from the registry-verified namespace domain8/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 81/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what COTAL actions (cotal.ai) does
- JANCTION RenderBlender and GLB/FBX/USD/STL rendered on cloud GPUs for AI agents: product shots, turntables, MP4not reviewedGrowingA
- PostHog MCP ServerOfficial PostHog MCP Server for product analytics, feature flags, experiments, and more.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Loki ModeAutonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI with an MCP server exposing 39 tools over stdio.not reviewedEstablishedB