Is Context Foundry MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
How Context Foundry compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 55/100
- higher than 10% of 48,255 servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-01 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan1500 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 113 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (2)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truecontext_foundry-2.2.1/tools/evolution/agents/scout_agent.py: … "Shell injection risk with shell=True", ), (r"os\.sys…
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalcontext_foundry-2.2.1/tools/evolution/agents/scout_agent.py: … (r"\beval\s*\(", "Dangerous use of eval() - code injection risk"), (…
Overall 55/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON