Is PySide6 MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B80/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How PySide6 MCP compares

Against every graded Scraping and browsing MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 80/100; higher than 54% of 867 Scraping and browsing servers
Tools that change things: 0%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 19 read · 3 run or deploy

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-16 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan12 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 41 days ago12/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

pyside6_mcp-0.1.0/pyside6_mcp/bridge.py: …ref()}, } try: result = eval(code, ctx) # noqa: S307 return …

Overall 80/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Bun Uia
Playwright for the Windows desktop, from Bun — drive native GUIs via UI Automation + MCP.
not reviewed
Growing
A
Playwright
Playwright Tools for MCP
not reviewed
Widely used
A
Ui.Vision MCP
MCP server for browser and desktop automation: OCR, image recognition, real mouse and keyboard input
not reviewed
Established
B