Is Hookcheck MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A85/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Hookcheck compares

Against every graded Security MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 85/100; higher than 70% of 918 Security servers
Tools that change things: 0%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 2 read

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-24 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan12 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

dist/core.js: …url); const code = await * res.text(); eval(code)). The REMOTE-EVAL pattern misses t…

Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Oauth Auditor
Scans MCP server auth code for OAuth 2.1 anti-patterns: token passthrough, missing audience
More from 4hmetuyar →
not reviewed
Growing
A
Jikida
Security tools for your AI: scan, pentest, check headers, guard code and scan repos for secrets.
not reviewed
Growing
A
PyMemoryEditor
Read, write and scan process memory, Cheat Engine style, on Windows, Linux and macOS.
not reviewed
Established
A