Is Nautilus Compass Memory MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Nautilus Compass Memory compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 82/100
- higher than 63% of 48,255 servers
- Uptime
- 75%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-30 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan132 source files scanned20/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1477ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityauth enforced (unknown)9/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalnautilus_compass-3.2.0/daemon.py: … # 砍激活 buffer(可 env 覆盖)。释放显存给共置的 gate B eval(soul 收敛路径)。 try: _max_seq = …
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
