Is Weapp Agent MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Weapp Agent compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 71/100
- higher than 38% of 4,464 AI and agents servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan11 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 87 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/tools/common.js: …in the MCP host process. const fn = new Function(`return (${source});`)(); if (typeof…
Overall 71/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Weapp Agent does
- Basic MemoryLocal-first knowledge management with bi-directional LLM sync via Markdown files.not reviewedWidely usedB
- HOL GuardLocal-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Agent-Native ChatMinimal chat-first app with durable threads, actions, and the app-agent loopnot reviewedEstablishedA
