Is Hypermnesia Viz MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A85/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Hypermnesia Viz compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 85/100; higher than 70% of 48,255 servers
Tools that change things: 0%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 1 read · 1 create

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan305 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Findings (1)

mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true

hypermnesia_mcp_viz-3.2.0/cortex_viz/infrastructure/mcp_client_spawn.py: …list. Args are passed as a list (no shell=True). The environment is merged from os.env…

Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Other servers that do what Hypermnesia Viz does

Codebase Memory
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
not reviewed
Widely used
C
Neo4j Memory
MCP Neo4j Knowledge Graph Memory Server
not reviewed
Established
A
Deja Vu
deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of forty-three coding agents.
not reviewed
Established
A

Hypermnesia Viz reviews, tools and install