Is BuildPulse MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How BuildPulse compares
Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 87/100
- higher than 73% of 1,119 Developer tools servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote Developer tools server answers 100%
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan3 source files scanned15/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 502ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
- Maintenancelast push 13 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10
Findings (2)
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.script - mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.scriptpackage.json: … "README.md" ], "scripts": { "postinstall": "node ./lib/install.js" }, "engines…
Overall 87/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what BuildPulse does
- RepoPilotLocal, deterministic review of Git changes: weakened tests and CI gates, risky flows, blast radius.not reviewedGrowingA
- SuvaduLocal shell history and AI agent sessions over MCP: search commands, failures, risk and git changesnot reviewedGrowingA
MergetrainQueue parallel-agent worktree branches, test together, serialize and recover Git pushes.not reviewedGrowingA