Is BridgeNode MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How BridgeNode MCP compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 85/100
- higher than 73% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 33%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote AI and agents server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 2 read · 1 change
Release history: 3 versions in the registry since 2026-09-10, latest 2026-10-11, typically one every 24 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-14 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan7 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1664ms20/20
- Tool poisoning3 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 1 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 4 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what BridgeNode MCP does
- freellmpoolOpenAI-compatible MCP gateway cataloging 22 LLM providers, with routing, failover, and tools.not reviewedEstablishedA
LmConnect Claude to any OpenAI-compatible LLM endpoint and offload routine work to a local model.not reviewedEstablishedA
AuscaPay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.not reviewedEstablishedA