Is Brainkb MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How Brainkb compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 79/100
- higher than 58% of 48,255 servers
- Tools that change things
- 19%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 43 read · 10 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 724ms20/20
- Tool poisoning53 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 10 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 7 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; GitHub account older than a year6/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 79/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Brainkb does
- Codebase MemoryCodebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.not reviewedWidely usedC
- Neo4j MemoryMCP Neo4j Knowledge Graph Memory Servernot reviewedEstablishedA
