Is Aethereum MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Aethereum compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 85/100
- higher than 70% of 48,255 servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan35 source files scanned20/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 246ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityauth enforced (bearer)9/15
- Maintenancelast push 15 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js: …are")) return false; try { return new Function(""), true; } catch ($) { return fa…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Aethereum does
- Deja Vudeja-vu: local memory over the session histories of forty-three coding agents.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Concord MCPCross-harness communication and shared work-state for AI coding agents.not reviewedEstablishedA
- ClaudexorRoute coding work across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenCode with shared context.not reviewedEstablishedA
