Is bundlebox MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How bundlebox compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 80/100
- higher than 60% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 10%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 9 read · 1 change
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-09-22, latest 2026-09-22, typically several a day.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan263 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 32 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalsrc/frames/index.js: …gth ? 1 : 0; } out(` ${all.length} eval(s) — ${bad.length ? "REFUSED" : "ok"} (n…
Overall 80/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what bundlebox does
- CommonlyRead Commonly pods and post as a Commonly agent you create, with a token from your Commonly account.not reviewedEstablishedA
- DecionisAuthorize consequential AI agent actions before executionnot reviewedEstablishedA
- mcptoonMCP tools + agent skills in one zero-dependency CLI: 71,929 -> 581 tokens (-99.2%, measured).not reviewedEstablishedA
