Mmcp.market

Is Containerization Assist MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A86/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium
  • Code scan668 source files scanned20/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 11 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10

Findings (1)

  • mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval
    dist/src/lib/module-path-resolver.js: …er) { try { const dirName = new Function('return typeof __dirname !== "undefined"…
Overall 86/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Containerization Assist does

  • Nora
    Operate self-hosted OpenClaw and Hermes agent fleets on Docker or Kubernetes from MCP clients.
    B
  • Kubernetes
    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Kubernetes and OpenShift
    A
  • Homebutler
    Tells an agent what changed on a server since it last looked - status, Docker, backups, Proxmox.
    C

Containerization Assist reviews, tools and install