Is Containerization Assist MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A86/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Containerization Assist compares

Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-08 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan668 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 7 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

dist/src/lib/module-path-resolver.js: …er) { try { const dirName = new Function('return typeof __dirname !== "undefined"…

Overall 86/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Nora
Operate self-hosted OpenClaw and Hermes agent fleets on Docker or Kubernetes from MCP clients.
not reviewed
Growing
B
Kubernetes
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Kubernetes and OpenShift
not reviewed
Established
A
Homebutler
Tells an agent what changed on a server since it last looked - status, Docker, backups, Proxmox.
not reviewed
Established
C