MCP.Market

Is Smart Context MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A85/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Smart Context compares

Against every graded Productivity MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
85/100
higher than 65% of 1,299 Productivity servers
Tools that change things
14%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 19 read · 3 change

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-06-11, latest 2026-09-18, typically one every 99 days.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium
  • Code scan98 source files scanned20/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 27 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Findings (1)

  • mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval
    src/review/heuristics.js: …: 'high', re: EVAL_RE, message: 'use of eval()' }, { kind: 'new-function', severity…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Smart Context does

  • Easy Notion
    Markdown-first Notion MCP server. ~6-7x fewer response tokens vs official Notion MCP. 43 tools.
    B

Smart Context reviews, tools and install