MCP.Market

Is site-spec MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A85/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How site-spec compares

Against every graded SEO MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
85/100
higher than 73% of 769 SEO servers
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 4 read

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-31 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium
  • Code scan2 source files scanned20/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 9 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Findings (1)

  • mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval
    dist/mcp.mjs: …ode, sch); const makeValidate = new Function(`${names_1.default.self}`, `${names_1.de…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what site-spec does

  • squirrelscan
    Website QA for your coding agent: audit SEO, performance, security, accessibility over MCP.
    B
  • Crawlie
    Technical SEO + GEO (AI-search) site audits: hosted crawls, prioritized fixes, report diffs.
    A
  • pseolint
    Penalty-risk audit for programmatic SEO sites: verdict, risk score, and a fix manifest.
    B

site-spec reviews, tools and install