Is Mathlas MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Mathlas compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 85/100
- higher than 73% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan25 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 8 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalmathlas_mcp-1.5.0/mathlas/ramanujan.py: …pr) # INDEPENDENT high-precision re-eval (the airtight gate, reused from verify.py…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Mathlas does
- SpotifyscraperPublic Spotify metadata, lyrics and podcasts for LLM agents. No API key, read-only.not reviewedEstablishedB
- Mnemoverse MemoryHosted agent memory that learns from outcomes, with shared rooms. No key: mcp.mnemoverse.com/mcpnot reviewedEstablishedA
