Is EXTRA - Native Computer Use MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How EXTRA - Native Computer Use compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 83/100
- higher than 65% of 48,255 servers
- Tools that change things
- 15%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 17 read · 3 change
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-09-14, latest 2026-09-18, typically one every 4 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan49 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 8 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-trueextra_desktop-0.2.5/cli.py: …ture_output=True, text=True, timeout=6, shell=True) cfa_val = proc.stdout.stri…
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON