Is Prism Scanner MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Prism Scanner compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 71/100
- higher than 38% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan22 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 174 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-trueprism_scanner-0.1.1/src/prism/engines/ast_engine.py: …ol: """Check if a function call has shell=True keyword argument.""" for kw in node…
Overall 71/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Prism Scanner does
- Agent Security ScannerSecurity layer for AI agents: blocks prompt injection, detects fake packages, scans vulnerabilities.not reviewedEstablishedC
- HOL GuardLocal-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Pm Claude Skills1310 professional Agent Skills + workflow recipes — searchable & fetchable over MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA