Is Lumen MCP server safe?
Not recommended.
Hidden from default browsing. Significant findings or unreachable.
How Lumen compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 53/100
- higher than 10% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityno auth information5/15
- Maintenancelast push 112 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 53/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Safer options for the same job
- PDFAgentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Local RagEasy-to-setup local RAG server with minimal configurationnot reviewedEstablishedA
- Power BI Authoring MCP Server (Local)The Power BI Authoring MCP server lets an AI agent create and change Power BI semantic models.not reviewedEstablishedA
