Head to head
shaft-mcp vs Zip
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SHAFT browser automation, capture, and offline deterministic failure diagnosis
Full listingNo reviews yet
Create, inspect and extract zip archives offline, with traversal, symlink and zip-bomb guards.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (90 and 88 out of 100). shaft-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| shaft-mcp | Zip | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A90/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 410 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |