Head to head
SeleniumBase MCP vs shaft-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SHAFT browser automation, capture, and offline deterministic failure diagnosis
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 90 out of 100). SeleniumBase MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| SeleniumBase MCP | shaft-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 13k | 410 |
| Downloads / week | 314k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 24 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |