Mmcp.market

Head to head

AIHawk vs shaft-mcp

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AIHawkio.github.feder-cr/aihawk
A
No reviews yet

AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.

Full listing
shaft-mcpio.github.ShaftHQ/shaft-mcp
A
No reviews yet

SHAFT browser automation, capture, and offline deterministic failure diagnosis

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 90 out of 100). AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.

 AIHawkshaft-mcp
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100A90/100
AdoptionWidely usedGrowing
GitHub stars32k410
Downloads / week6.0k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools16—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

AIHawk vs Oya BrowserAIHawk vs Aginx BrowserAIHawk vs Web ScraperAIHawk vs SeleniumBase MCPAIHawk vs ScrapelessAll Scraping and browsing servers